New here? Get 15% off your first order.See how it works

Nursing questions
Discussion postVulnerable populations

Function as an advocate for vulnerable populations

Four clients who are vulnerable for four different reasons. The last one is employed and married, which is the brief's way of testing whether you think vulnerability means poverty.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 23, 2026

01

Four clients, four different vulnerabilities

The four cases are chosen to be different from each other and answering them with one generic advocacy paragraph wastes the design. The pregnant homeless woman is vulnerable through material circumstance, and her assistance is concrete: antenatal care that does not require a fixed address, housing referral, nutrition support, and a plan that anticipates the discharge problem of leaving hospital with a newborn and nowhere to go. The runaway sixteen-year-old is vulnerable through age, legal status and injecting drug use at once, which raises consent and reporting duties alongside harm reduction, testing and the question of who has custody. The immigrant worker's vulnerability is largely structural: a positive skin test needs confirmation and evaluation for active disease, and the barriers are cost, language, work hours and a well-founded fear about immigration consequences that a nurse should address explicitly rather than ignore. Say what you would do about that fear rather than treating it as outside your remit.

The fourth client is the one to think about hardest, because he is employed, married and acquired his infection from the health system itself. He appears in the list precisely to break the association between vulnerability and disadvantage. His vulnerability is stigma and its consequences: disclosure to family, employment concerns, insurance, and the fact that a chronic infection acquired thirty years ago carries risks of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma that require ongoing surveillance he may not be receiving. Notice that the brief's own framing sentence is about humiliation and judgment rather than about poverty, so it has told you what connects the four. For the advocacy question itself, distinguish the levels: advocating for an individual client is different from advocating for a population, and the strongest answers do both, naming the policy or organisational change each case points toward. Two levels, four cases, and one connecting idea is the shape to aim for.

Likely learning objectives

  • Distinguish material, legal, structural and stigma-based vulnerability. That last sentence is what turns four case responses into an answer to the question actually asked.
  • Match assistance to the specific source of each client's vulnerability.
  • Recognise that vulnerability is not synonymous with disadvantage.
  • Separate individual advocacy from population-level advocacy.

Assignment instructions

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Some vulnerable populations may have diseases, health impairments, and pregnancy that bring humiliation and predisposed judgment. Unfortunately, these health conditions can cause vulnerable populations to become ostracized by the general public. What ways would you choose to function as an advocate for vulnerable populations? Discuss the types of assistance you might provide to each of the following clients from a vulnerable population: A 24-year-old pregnant woman who is currently homeless and unmarried A 16-year-old girl who has run away from her foster home and who has an IV drug habit An immigrant worker whose TB skin test just came back positive An employed, married man who contracted Hepatitis B through a blood transfusion 30 years ago

Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. Function as an advocate for vulnerable populations ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Function as an advocate for vulnerable populations

02

What this discussion asks for

  1. 01An account of the ways you would function as an advocate for vulnerable populations.
  2. 02The types of assistance you might provide to the pregnant homeless woman.
  3. 03The assistance for the 16-year-old runaway with an intravenous drug habit.
  4. 04The assistance for the immigrant worker with a positive TB skin test.
  5. 05The assistance for the employed married man with hepatitis B from a transfusion.
03

A general stance, then four specific responses

01

What advocacy means here

Define advocacy at individual and population levels.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Two levels distinguished before the cases begin.

02

The pregnant homeless woman

Address antenatal access, housing, nutrition and the discharge problem.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Concrete assistance including what happens at discharge.

03

The runaway with injecting drug use

Address consent, custody, reporting, harm reduction and testing.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Legal duties handled alongside clinical care.

04

The worker with a positive skin test

Address confirmation, evaluation and the structural barriers to completing it.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Immigration fear named explicitly.

05

The man with hepatitis B

Address stigma, disclosure, and long-term surveillance requirements.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Vulnerability located in stigma rather than in circumstance.

06

What the four have in common

Return to the humiliation and judgment framing and name the population-level change.

What the assessor is likely looking for

A policy or organisational implication drawn from the four.

04

Where the population-specific guidance sits

Recommended databases

  • MedlinePlus
  • NCBI Bookshelf
  • PubMed Central
  • USPSTF

Search sequence

  1. 1.Look up latent tuberculosis evaluation before writing the third case.
  2. 2.Check hepatitis B long-term surveillance guidance for the fourth.
  3. 3.Read on adolescent consent and confidentiality for the second case.
  4. 4.Search homelessness and perinatal outcomes for the first.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Health Disparities

MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine · 2024

Review before citing

Health disparities, for the population-level framing of the four cases.

Social Determinants of Health

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · 2025

Review before citing

Social determinants, for the structural barriers in cases one and three.

06

Before you post

Common mistakes

  • Answering all four cases with one generic advocacy statement.
  • Treating the fourth client as not genuinely vulnerable.
  • Ignoring consent and reporting duties for the minor.
  • Omitting immigration fear as a barrier for the third client.
  • Staying at the individual level and never reaching population advocacy.

Submission checklist

  • Does each client get a distinct response?
  • Have you identified the source of vulnerability in each case?
  • Are the legal duties around the minor addressed?
  • Is stigma treated as a genuine vulnerability?
  • Does the post reach population-level advocacy?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Maren Caldwell

MSN, RN, CNE

Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation

Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by

Dr. Tessa Redmond

DNP, RN, CNE

Evidence-based practice and clinical education

Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order