Health insurance companies Discussion
Six questions define a clean claim. The seventh asks you to build the process that produces them, and that is a different kind of answer.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 25, 2026
Definitions first, then the process question underneath them
A clean claim is one that passes on first submission without additional information, correction or manual intervention, and the definition is worth stating precisely because everything else in the prompt follows from it. Notice what it implies: cleanliness is a property of the claim at the moment it leaves the practice, so almost all of the work happens before billing ever sees it. Eligibility was verified or it was not; the documentation supported the level of service or it did not; the diagnosis established medical necessity for the procedure or it did not. Rejections and denials are also worth separating, since a rejection fails a front-end edit before the payer adjudicates and can be corrected and resubmitted, while a denial is an adjudicated decision that has to be appealed, and the timelines and consequences differ. Getting that distinction right early makes the rest of the answer easier to organise.
The last question changes register, and it is the one a marker reads for management thinking. As a practice manager you cannot inspect quality into claims one at a time; the only durable answer is a process that prevents the common causes. Verify eligibility at scheduling and again at check-in, since coverage changes between the two; run claim scrubbing before submission so front-end edits fire in your office rather than the payer's; track denial reason codes by category and by clinician, because a recurring code is a training problem with a name attached; and set the first-pass rate as the metric people are actually held to, with a target and a review cadence. Say what you would measure, because a process with no measure is a policy, and policies do not survive a busy Tuesday. Name the target and the cadence, and the process becomes something a team can be held to.
Likely learning objectives
- Define a clean claim precisely and derive its requirements from the definition.
- Distinguish a rejection from a denial and their different remedies.
- Locate most claim quality upstream of the billing office.
- Design a preventive process with a measurable first-pass target.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Health insurance companies provide the majority of the payment for medical services that clinics and physicians deliver. After the care has been delivered, the medical record is reviewed for completeness, codes are applied, and the billing office submits the claim to the insurance company or other third party payer for payment. There are several steps to take when submitting a claim form to the insurance company for reimbursement. The result of a clean claim is proper reimbursement for the services the facility has provided. Discuss the following: What does it mean to submit a clean claim? List all of the information that is important before the claim can be submitted. Discuss some of the reasons why a claim may be rejected. State various reasons for the importance of a clean claim submission. Address the consequences of not submitting a clean claim. What steps should be taken to check the claim status? As the practice manager, how would you ensure that the claims process results in clean claim submission and very few claim rejections.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
What this claims discussion requires
- 01An explanation of what it means to submit a clean claim.
- 02A list of all information required before a claim can be submitted.
- 03Reasons why a claim may be rejected.
- 04Reasons for the importance of clean claim submission.
- 05The consequences of not submitting a clean claim.
- 06The steps to take to check claim status.
- 07A practice manager's approach to ensuring clean claims and few rejections.
Seven questions, answered in order
What a clean claim is
Give the definition and its implication for where work happens.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A definition that generates the rest of the answer.
Everything needed before submission
List patient, insurance, provider, encounter, coding and authorisation data.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Completeness across all six categories.
Why claims are rejected
Cover eligibility, demographic mismatch, coding and medical necessity.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Causes tied to where they originate.
Rejection versus denial
Separate front-end edits from adjudicated decisions.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Different remedies and timelines named.
Consequences and status checking
Cover cash flow, rework cost, timely filing limits and how status is tracked.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Consequences quantified where possible.
The manager's process
Set out prevention, scrubbing, denial code analysis and the first-pass metric.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A system with a measure rather than an exhortation.
Where the coding and claims rules sit
Recommended databases
- CMS
- KFF
- PubMed Central
- NCBI Bookshelf
Search sequence
- 1.Read the CMS coding and billing guidance for the required data elements.
- 2.Look up the NCCI edits for a concrete example of a front-end rejection cause.
- 3.Find denial rate data to quantify the consequence.
- 4.Check remittance advice documentation for how status and reason codes are read.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
ICD-10
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2025
ICD-10 coding, for the diagnosis coding that establishes medical necessity.
NCCI for Medicare | CMS
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2024
NCCI edits, for a concrete cause of front-end rejection.
Health Care Payment and Remittance Advice
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2025
Payment and remittance advice, for how claim status and reason codes are read.
Denial rate data, for quantifying the consequence of unclean claims.
Denials and appeals, for the difference between correcting and appealing.
Before you post
Common mistakes
- Using rejection and denial interchangeably.
- Listing required fields without connecting them to why claims fail.
- Answering the manager question with an instruction to be careful.
- Ignoring eligibility verification as the largest preventable cause.
- Proposing a process with no metric attached.
Submission checklist
- Is the clean claim definition stated precisely?
- Are rejections and denials distinguished with their different remedies?
- Does the required-information list cover patient, provider, coding and payer data?
- Does the manager answer describe prevention rather than inspection?
- Is a first-pass rate or equivalent metric named?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.
Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.