DQ 2 :Discuss two principles your personal worldview has in common with the GCU Christian worldview
The anchor is your practice site's actual mission and vision, which means going and reading them. Two principles, quoted alignment, and a mechanism reaching patient care.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 18, 2026
Two principles, aligned to a mission you can quote
Go and read your organisation's mission and vision before writing, because the prompt anchors the whole answer to them and a paraphrase from memory will not align with anything. Most health system statements contain a small set of recurring commitments — dignity of the person, service to community, stewardship of resources, excellence, compassion, integrity — and your task is to find two principles that genuinely appear in both your own worldview and that statement. Choose two that do different work rather than two versions of caring. Dignity of the person and stewardship, for instance, pull in different directions often enough to be interesting: one says every patient's claim is equal regardless of circumstance, the other says finite resources must be used responsibly, and a clinician holds both. A statement recalled from memory will align with whatever you already believed, which is why the reading comes first.
Then make the alignment concrete by quoting the statement rather than summarising it, and say where the two principles show up in what the organisation actually does — a charity care policy, an interpreter service, a community benefit programme, a decision not to close a service line. Alignment that cannot point at a practice is a claim about language. Then answer the last clause with a mechanism reaching a patient: dignity operationalised means the interpreter is called rather than the patient's child, that the person who cannot pay is screened for assistance at the point of contact rather than at billing, that a name is used. Stewardship operationalised means the test that would not change management is not ordered, which frees time and money for something that will. The brief says no research support is required, so spend the words on specifics from your own site instead — that is the only thing that makes this post yours.
Likely learning objectives
- Locate and quote an organisation's actual mission and vision.
- Select two principles that do different work.
- Demonstrate alignment through practice rather than through language.
- Operationalise a principle into a patient-level action.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
DNP 801 Topic 7 DQ 2 DQ 2 :Discuss two principles your personal worldview has in common with the GCU Christian worldview Discuss two principles your personal worldview has in common with GCU Christian worldview. Explain how these common principles align with the mission and vision from your practice site and how they fundamentally serve to promote patient care. (This response does not require research support.)
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01Two named principles.
- 02A quoted phrase from your practice site's mission or vision.
- 03A practice or policy where each principle is visible.
- 04A patient-level action each principle produces.
- 05A tension between the two, acknowledged.
The principles, the site's mission, then patient care
What your site actually says
Quote the mission and vision rather than summarising them.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A quoted phrase, attributable.
Two principles that differ
Select principles that do different work.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Two principles that could conflict.
Where they show up in practice
Point at a policy or programme for each.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A practice a colleague would recognise.
Operationalised at the bedside
Convert each principle into a patient-level action.
What the assessor is likely looking for
An action taken with a specific patient.
Where they pull against each other
Acknowledge the tension and how you would hold it.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A case where the two principles disagree.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
A Framework for Ethical Decision Making
Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University · 2021
A framework separating the ethical approaches your two principles may belong to.
Virtue Ethics
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · 2022
Virtue ethics, for principles held as character rather than as rules.
Community health needs assessment for charitable hospital organizations - Section 501(r)(3) | Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service · 2024
The community benefit obligation — where an organisation's stated values become a requirement.
SPIRITUALITY
Nursing Fundamentals, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Spirituality in nursing practice, for worldview at the bedside.
Review before submission
Common mistakes
- Paraphrasing the mission from memory rather than reading it.
- Choosing two principles that are the same idea twice.
- Claiming alignment without pointing at a practice.
- Ending on values rather than on a patient-level action.
Submission checklist
- Have you quoted the actual mission or vision?
- Do your two principles do different work?
- Is each linked to something the organisation actually does?
- Does each produce a specific patient-level action?
- Have you acknowledged where they pull against each other?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.