DVT and pulmonary embolism Essay
A named hospital-acquired condition with a named surgical context, which means the answer is a prophylaxis protocol rather than a general statement about risk management culture.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 22, 2026
Why CMS put this pair on the list
Anchor the answer in the payment mechanism, because that is what makes these conditions different from other complications. The hospital-acquired conditions programme reduces payment for conditions that were not present on admission and that could reasonably have been prevented through evidence-based guidelines, and deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following total knee or hip replacement are on that list by name. Two consequences follow and both are worth stating. Present-on-admission documentation becomes clinically and financially load-bearing, and prevention stops being a matter of individual vigilance and becomes a protocol the organisation is accountable for running. It is worth being precise about the label as well, because never event and hospital-acquired condition are related but not identical: the never event vocabulary comes from a list of serious reportable events, while the payment rule operates on a separate CMS list. Check which list your condition appears on before attaching a financial consequence to it.
Then describe the actions concretely, because a post that says organisations focus on prevention has said nothing. Risk assessment on admission using a validated tool, a mandatory prophylaxis decision built into the order set so that omission requires an explicit reason, mechanical prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression, pharmacological prophylaxis chosen by procedure and bleeding risk, early mobilisation protocols, and audit with feedback to surgical teams are the recognisable elements. Then say the thing that raises the post above a checklist: this is a genuine trade-off, not a solved problem. More aggressive anticoagulation reduces thromboembolism and increases bleeding and wound complications, guidelines have moved on the balance for elective hip and knee replacement, and reasonable surgeons disagree about aspirin versus direct oral anticoagulants. Naming that tension is what shows you understand why the condition still occurs in well-run hospitals. Prevention here is a risk balance being managed continuously, not a defect being eliminated.
Likely learning objectives
- Explain the payment mechanism that defines hospital-acquired conditions.
- Describe present-on-admission documentation as a clinical and financial control.
- Set out the components of a venous thromboembolism prevention protocol.
- Articulate the bleeding trade-off that keeps prophylaxis contested.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Elaborated this on DVT and pulmonary embolism following certain orthopedic procedures (total knee replacement, hip replacement) The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes a list of health care-acquired conditions (HACs) that reasonably could have been prevented through the application of risk management strategies. What actions has your health care organization (or have health care organizations in general) implemented to manage or prevent these “never events” from happening within their health care facilities? Support your response with a minimum two peer-reviewed articles. You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. DVT and pulmonary embolism Essay Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. DVT and pulmonary embolism Essay
Turn the brief into deliverables
- 01The CMS hospital-acquired conditions mechanism, described accurately.
- 02The role of present-on-admission documentation.
- 03Named prevention actions, mechanical and pharmacological.
- 04An audit or feedback mechanism as an organisational action.
- 05The bleeding trade-off, stated as a real clinical tension.
- 06Sources supporting the prevention claims.
The payment rule, the protocol, then the trade-off
What the CMS list actually does
Explain the payment adjustment and the reasonably-preventable standard.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Payment consequence tied to the preventability criterion.
Present on admission
Show how POA coding decides whether a condition counts as hospital-acquired.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Documentation identified as the control point.
The prevention protocol
Set out risk assessment, order sets, mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A forcing function such as a mandatory prophylaxis decision in the order set.
Audit and feedback
Describe how compliance is measured and returned to surgical teams.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A measured compliance rate rather than an educational intervention.
The bleeding trade-off
Explain why more prophylaxis is not straightforwardly better.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A named alternative agent and the disagreement about it.
Where the prophylaxis guidance and the CMS list are published
Recommended databases
- CMS
- AHRQ PSNet
- PubMed Central
- NCBI Bookshelf
Search sequence
- 1.Confirm which conditions appear on the current CMS list before writing.
- 2.Read a prophylaxis reference and note how agent choice varies by procedure.
- 3.Find a study of guideline appropriateness in elective joint replacement.
- 4.Look up how present-on-admission indicators are assigned.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Never Events
AHRQ Patient Safety Network · 2024
The never events concept and its relationship to payment policy.
Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2024
Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, for the mechanical and pharmacological options.
Preventing Venous Thromboembolism after elective total hip arthroplasty surgery – are the current guidelines appropriate? Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in elective total hip arthroplasty surgery
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, via PubMed Central · 2022
Prophylaxis after elective hip arthroplasty, for the guideline disagreement.
Patient Safety and Quality
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, NCBI Bookshelf · 2008
Patient safety and quality, for the organisational rather than individual framing.
Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · 2025
A parallel payment programme, for how financial levers shape prevention behaviour.
Before you post to this topic's forum
Common mistakes
- Describing risk management culture rather than naming actions.
- Treating never event as meaning the complication never happens.
- Omitting present-on-admission coding, which is what makes the rule operate.
- Presenting prophylaxis as unambiguously beneficial with no bleeding cost.
- Discussing the whole CMS list without addressing the pair the brief names.
Submission checklist
- Have you named the payment mechanism rather than just the list?
- Is present-on-admission documentation addressed?
- Are both mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis covered?
- Is the bleeding trade-off stated explicitly?
- Does your answer stay focused on joint replacement as the brief directs?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.