New here? Get 15% off your first order.See how it works

Nursing questions

Executive Leadership Proposal

Four pages addressed to executives, not to nurses. The competencies score interprofessional reasoning, so a proposal that only asks what nursing needs is answering the wrong audience.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 23, 2026

01

The audience is the executive team, not the unit

Two things about this assessment shape the whole document. The first is the audience: it is a proposal for executive leadership, which means the argument has to be made in the currency executives work in, namely organisational risk, quality performance, workforce stability and cost. A proposal that argues a change would be better for nurses is not wrong, but it is incomplete, and the competency about how a problem impacts the organisation, patients and the profession is there precisely to make you argue all three. The second is that every competency statement mentions interprofessional work, so a proposal that positions nursing alone as both the problem holder and the solution has misread the framing it will be scored against. Read the three competency statements before drafting, because they describe the paper more precisely than the task sentence does. All three competencies name interprofessional work, which is the strongest signal the brief gives you.

Choose a problem narrow enough to propose something specific about. Handover failures at shift change, delayed escalation of deteriorating patients, discharge teaching that does not reduce readmission, or the absence of protected time for evidence review are all real, all supported in the literature, and all genuinely interprofessional. Then name the team members you would enlist and say what each brings rather than listing disciplines: pharmacy for medication reconciliation, respiratory therapy for escalation criteria, case management for discharge trajectory, informatics for the documentation that makes any of it measurable. The resistance section is where proposals become credible or not, so be honest about who will object and why. Resistance is usually rational, arising from workload, from a previous initiative that consumed effort and disappeared, or from a genuine disagreement about priority, and a strategy that treats it as ignorance will not survive contact with the people concerned.

Likely learning objectives

  • Address a proposal to an executive audience in organisational terms.
  • Argue a problem's impact on the organisation, patients and the profession together.
  • Assemble an interprofessional team by contribution rather than by discipline.
  • Treat resistance to change as rational and respond accordingly.

Assignment instructions

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Assignment Executive Leadership Proposal Executive Leadership Proposal Develop a 4 page proposal for executive leadership that addresses changes you would like to see within your organization that would advance the field of nursing. Nursing is in the midst of many changes. In this assessment you will consider how you can be a driving force to bring about needed change within the field of nursing. By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria: · Competency 1: Explain strategies for effective interprofessional teamwork and collaboration in health care delivery. . Analyze barriers and resistance to change, and describe strategies to overcome these barriers and resistance to change from an organization, patients, or colleagues. . Identify other health care professionals to enlist as members of an interprofessional team to drive change in an organization. · Competency 2: Analyze the implications of working with interprofessional teams in multifaceted health care settings. . Analyze how a problem impacts an organization, patients, or the nursing profession. · Competency 3: Develop evidence-based nursing interventions to address specific problems and enable systemic change. . Describe evidence-based solutions to a problem and develop a plan to implement these solutions. · Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations of a nursing professional. . Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Use correct APA format. Assessment Instructions Preparation To prepare for this assessment, you will need to think about changes you feel are needed to address a problem either within nursing as a professional field or within the organization where you work. Narrow down your options by considering which change would best be undertaken by an interprofessional team. Some examples for you to consider might include: · The use of mobile and portable technology to support patients. · Using evidence-based practice (EBP) to improve patient care. · Increasing patient safety and quality of care. · The use of medical technology such as genes and stem cells, or robots in the OR. Assignment Executive Leadership Proposal · Addressing the nursing shortage now and into the future. · Improving the work environment (providing calm, supportive spaces for nurses; improved dialog between health care professionals). · Better safety for nurses at work (violence, spreading diseases, physical injury). · Substance abuse by health care professionals. Or you can narrow the scope to an issue within your own organization: · Developing a mobility program for an inpatient unit. · Implementing “smart” technology to assist in patient monitoring. · Creating a mentoring program to attract and retain nurses. · Implementing protocols for infection control and/or treatment of an epidemic. · Developing a plan to eliminate physical violence and verbal abuse in the workplace. · Other. Once you have selected an issue to address, look for scholarly and professional articles that focus on the problem, the needed change, and how interprofessional teams can work together to drive change. Requirements Lately you have noticed the need for changes within your organization that would advance the field of nursing. You have decided to develop a proposal and submit it to executive leadership. Format this assessment as a professional proposal. You may want to look at how proposals are drafted within your organization and follow that format. You will still need a references page; follow APA guidelines for in-text citations and references. Address the following in your proposal: · Briefly describe the problem and how it impacts the organization, patients, and/or the nursing profession. · Describe possible evidence-based interventions for the problem. · Analyze potential barriers and resistance to change that might come from the organization, patients, and/or colleagues. · Describe strategies to overcome barriers and resistance to change. · Develop a plan to implement evidence-based interventions. What steps would you take? What resources might you need? · Identify other health care professionals to enlist as team members to help drive change in the organization. Your completed assessment should be 4 pages in length, not including title page and references page. Support your statements and intervention plan with references to and citations for at least four scholarly or professional resources. Additional Requirements · Include a title page and references page. · Reference at least four current scholarly or professional resources. · Use APA format for citations and references. · Use Times New Roman font, 12 point. Executive Leadership Proposal Assignment.

Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation Hi Class, Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts. Contact me if you have any questions. Important information on Writing a Discussion Question Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references) There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article. Include in-text citations in your response Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information Follow APA-7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week. Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references) Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count. Follow APA 7th edition Points will be deducted if the above is not followed Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points. Here are some helpful links Student paper example Citing Sources The Writing Center is a great resource Welcome to class Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to. I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you. Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted. If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations. Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements. Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week. I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

02

What the executive proposal must contain

  1. 01A four page proposal for executive leadership.
  2. 02Strategies for effective interprofessional teamwork and collaboration.
  3. 03An analysis of barriers and resistance to change with strategies to overcome them.
  4. 04Identification of other health care professionals to enlist in an interprofessional team.
  5. 05An analysis of how the problem impacts the organization, patients or the nursing profession.
  6. 06Evidence-based nursing interventions that enable systemic change.
03

Problem, impact, team, intervention, resistance

01

The problem, stated for executives

Define the problem in terms of risk, performance and cost.

What the assessor is likely looking for

A problem statement in the audience's own terms.

02

Impact at three levels

Analyse effects on the organisation, on patients and on the profession.

What the assessor is likely looking for

All three levels covered, as the competency requires.

03

The interprofessional team

Identify the professionals to enlist and what each contributes.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Contribution rather than representation.

04

The evidence-based intervention

Propose the change and cite the evidence that it works.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Evidence for this intervention, not for the general idea.

05

Barriers and resistance

Identify who will resist, why, and what would address it.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Resistance treated as rational.

06

What success would look like

Define the measure, the baseline and the review point.

What the assessor is likely looking for

A measurable commitment an executive could hold you to.

04

Where the evidence for the intervention sits

Recommended databases

  • PubMed Central
  • AHRQ
  • NCBI Bookshelf
  • Capella Library

Search sequence

  1. 1.Choose the problem, then search for interventions with published effect sizes.
  2. 2.Read an interprofessional collaboration source for the team composition argument.
  3. 3.Search implementation barriers for the resistance section.
  4. 4.Find a measure with an established baseline so success is definable.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

TeamSTEPPS 3.0

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024

Review before citing

A structured teamwork programme with an evidence base, as a candidate intervention.

06

Before you submit the proposal

Common mistakes

  • Writing to a nursing audience when the brief names executive leadership.
  • Arguing the change benefits nurses without addressing organisational impact.
  • Positioning nursing as the sole owner of an interprofessional problem.
  • Listing disciplines without saying what each contributes.
  • Treating resistance as ignorance rather than as a rational response.

Submission checklist

  • Would an executive recognise the argument as addressed to them?
  • Is impact argued at organisational, patient and professional levels?
  • Does each team member have a stated contribution?
  • Is the resistance analysis honest about legitimate objections?
  • Is the intervention supported by evidence rather than by preference?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Maren Caldwell

MSN, RN, CNE

Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation

Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by

Dr. Tessa Redmond

DNP, RN, CNE

Evidence-based practice and clinical education

Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order