Health Promotion And Wellness Essay
This assignment is an input to a later one. Choosing the family and the format carelessly now means redoing the work in Module 5, and the brief says so plainly.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 25, 2026
Module 2 is written to be reused in Module 5
The brief tells you outright that this work will be summarised into the Module 5 Family Health Assessment and that the same interview family must be used, so treat it as the first instalment of a larger piece rather than a standalone task. Two practical consequences follow. Choose a family with enough going on to sustain a full assessment later, since a household with no chronic conditions, no caregiving burden and no access difficulties leaves you very little to build on. And record your assessment in a form you can carry forward, keeping the instrument's domain structure intact rather than collapsing it into prose, because a summary that has lost the domains cannot be summarised again without going back to the family. Both decisions are cheap to make well now and expensive to correct in Module 5. Both are cheap to get right now and expensive to correct once Module 5 is under way.
The substance is the link between assessment findings and recommendations, and the failure mode is recommendations that could have been written before the interview. If your advice is that the family should eat better, exercise more and attend screenings, you have produced public health messaging rather than an assessment-driven plan. Tie each recommendation to a specific finding, name the domain it came from, and make it something this family could act on given their actual constraints of time, money, transport, language and who in the household holds decision-making authority. It also helps to prioritise rather than list: three recommendations with a stated reason for their order reads as clinical judgement, while nine of equal weight reads as a checklist. Say what you would follow up first and what would tell you it worked, since the detail the brief asks for is the difference between a recommendation and a plan.
Likely learning objectives
- Treat an early assignment as an input to a later, larger one.
- Preserve an instrument's domain structure for reuse.
- Derive each recommendation from a named assessment finding.
- Prioritise recommendations and justify the ordering.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
The major assignment for this course is an interview of a Family and an assessment of Family characteristics which is due in Module 5/Week 5. Module 2-1 assignment information will be summarized and included in your Assignment Module 5-1 Family Health Assessment. Please use your interview family for this assignment. Identify areas needing intervention by using the using the modified Love to Live Well Assessment below to highlight suggestions you may make for your interview family Use your interview family and identify areas for making health and wellness promotion. Describe these recommendations for health promotion in detail. Complete and submit your assignment by 2359 Saturday of Module 2
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Health Promotion And Wellness Essay Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Health Promotion And Wellness Essay
What the Module 2 assignment requires
- 01Use of your interview family, the same one carried into the Module 5 Family Health Assessment.
- 02Identification of areas needing intervention using the modified Love to Live Well Assessment.
- 03Identification of areas for health and wellness promotion for that family.
- 04A detailed description of the health promotion recommendations.
- 05Submission by the stated Module 2 deadline.
Assessment first, recommendations second
The family and how you gathered data
Describe the household, the interview and its limits.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Enough detail to justify later assessment.
Assessment by domain
Report findings against each domain of the instrument.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Domain structure preserved.
Areas needing intervention
Identify where findings fall short and why it matters clinically.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Clinical significance, not just deviation.
Recommendations, tied to findings
Give each recommendation with its source finding and rationale.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Traceability from finding to advice.
Feasibility for this family
Test each recommendation against time, cost, transport and authority.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Constraints applied rather than acknowledged.
Priority and follow-up
Order the recommendations and say what would show progress.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Judgement expressed as ordering.
Where the family assessment and prevention evidence sits
Recommended databases
- MedlinePlus
- Healthy People 2030
- PubMed Central
- USPSTF
Search sequence
- 1.Read on family health assessment interviews for the data-gathering method.
- 2.Check preventive service recommendations by age for the family members involved.
- 3.Look up health literacy guidance for how recommendations should be phrased.
- 4.Find evidence on family-level interventions to support prioritisation.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Why is it important to know my family health history?: MedlinePlus Genetics
MedlinePlus, U.S. National Library of Medicine · 2024
Family health history, for why family-level assessment changes individual risk.
Creating a family health history interview protocol for use with undergraduate health professional students
Public Health in Practice · 2025
A family health history interview protocol, for structuring the interview.
Family Health Conversations — A Short-Term Supportive Intervention to Improve Family Well-Being, Functioning, and Involvement in Care
PMC / National Library of Medicine · 2025
Family health conversations as an intervention, for the recommendation evidence.
Leading Health Indicators - Healthy People 2030
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · 2024
Leading health indicators, for prioritising among prevention targets.
Health Literacy
MedlinePlus, National Library of Medicine · 2025
Health literacy, for phrasing recommendations a family can act on.
Before you submit
Common mistakes
- Choosing a family with too little going on to support the Module 5 assessment.
- Writing recommendations that could have been made without the interview.
- Collapsing the instrument's domains into undifferentiated prose.
- Listing many recommendations of equal weight with no priority.
- Ignoring the family's practical constraints on acting.
Submission checklist
- Is the same family being carried into Module 5?
- Are the instrument's domains preserved in your record?
- Does every recommendation cite the finding that produced it?
- Are recommendations prioritised with a stated reason?
- Is each recommendation feasible given this family's constraints?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.