Guido’s MORAL Model Discussion
One scenario examined twice: once as an ethical dilemma through a decision model, then again as a policy question. The second pass is where most submissions run out.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 23, 2026
The same case, examined through two different lenses
The assignment has a hinge in the middle that is easy to miss. The first half is an ethics exercise: apply a structured decision model and analyse moral distress. The second half takes the same case and asks you to look at it as a policy problem, which is a different question with a different unit of analysis. Ethics asks what should be done for this patient by these clinicians; policy asks what rule should govern all cases of this kind, who would support it and who would resist. Answering the second half in ethical language is the most common failure here, and it produces a submission that says the same thing twice. Say which unit of analysis you are using at each point, because the shift between them is exactly what the assignment tests, and a submission that never makes the shift reads as one answer padded to twice its length.
Work the model as a model rather than as headings. A structured ethical decision framework makes you state the problem, gather and weigh options, act, and then review the outcome, and the review step is the one students skip because the case ends before it. Moral distress is worth defining precisely, because it is not the same as an ethical dilemma: distress arises when you know what is right and are constrained from doing it, which is why its remedies are structural, including ethics consultation, escalation pathways and a unit culture that permits objection. On the minor's decision-making, distinguish the legal position, which varies by jurisdiction and turns on mature minor and emancipation doctrines, from the ethical position about assent and evolving capacity. Then in the policy pass, be concrete about who supports and who resists a proposed rule, because that political mapping is what the framework questions are designed to elicit.
Likely learning objectives
- Distinguish an ethical analysis from a policy analysis of the same case.
- Apply a structured decision model including its review step.
- Define moral distress precisely and locate its structural remedies.
- Separate the legal and ethical positions on minor decision-making.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
1. Apply Guido’s MORAL model to resolve the dilemma presented in the case study described in EXERCISE 4–3 (Guido textbook). How might the nurses in this scenario respond to the physician’s request? How would this scenario begin to cause moral distress among the nursing staff, and what are the positive actions that the nurses might begin to take to prevent moral distress? 2. Read the case study entitled You be the Ethicist, presented at the end of Chapter 3 (Guido textbook). What are the compelling rights that this case addresses? Whose rights should take precedence? Does a child (specifically this competent 14-year-old) have the right to determine what will happen to him? Should he ethically have this right? How would you have decided the outcome if his disease state had not intervened? Now, examine the scenario from the perspective of health care policy. How would you begin to evaluate the need for the policy and the possible support or lack of support for the policy from your peers, nursing management, and others who might be affected by the policy? Do the 10 framework questions outlined by Malone in chapter 4 (Guido textbook) assist in this process? Create a process proposal for the organization with possible guidelines, procedures, and policies to address the issues you have identified. EXERCISE 4–3 Mrs. R., an 87-year-old patient, has a past history that includes coronary artery disease, a previous stroke, and advanced Alzheimer’s disease. Ten days ago, Mrs. R. was hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia and has been ventilator dependent since being admitted to the intensive care unit in a small rural hospital. Family members visit daily and have repeatedly voiced their concern to the nursing staff about the continued ventilator support that Mrs. R. is receiving, most notably the fact that Mrs. R. would never have wanted such care. They also note that Mrs. R. has not recognized them in past months and that they plan to visit less in future days, but can be contacted should any change in Mrs. R.’s condition occur. Her primary physician has practiced in this community for multiple years; he is well-known for his reluctance to discontinue any type of life support for any patient. When questioned, Dr. G.’s consistent response is, if this were his frail 92-year-old mother, he would prescribe the very same treatment for her. Dr. G. has now requested that the nurses talk to the family about moving Mrs. R. to a major medical center, where she can receive more advanced care, including vigorous rehabilitation and physical therapy, so that she may eventually return to a long-term nursing care facility. Guido’s MORAL Model Discussion How might the nurses in this scenario respond to the physician’s request? How would this scenario begin to cause moral distress among the nursing staff and what are the positive actions that the nurses should begin to take to prevent moral distress? You be the Ethicist Until recently, Tyrell Dueck was a normal eighth-grader in Canada, hoping that his favorite team would win the Stanley Cup for the third time. Then, early in the school year, he slipped climbing out of the shower and discovered a lump on his leg. He was then diagnosed with bone cancer. After receiving two rounds of chemotherapy and being told that further therapy would mean the amputation of his leg, he announced that he wanted therapy stopped. He and his parents, devout fundamentalist Christians, decided to leave his health in God’s hands and seek alternative therapy. The decision sparked a court battle between his parents, who supported Tyrell’s decision, and the health care team, who sought to compel continued medical treatment and the planned amputation. The battle ultimately ended when doctors said that his cancer had spread to his lungs and that there was little more that could be done for Tyrell. TEXTBOOK: Legal and Ethical Issues in Nursing Ginny Wa Guido
What the Guido case assignment requires
- 01Guido's MORAL model applied to the Exercise 4-3 dilemma.
- 02An account of how the scenario causes moral distress and what positive actions prevent it.
- 03The compelling rights in the You be the Ethicist case and whose should take precedence.
- 04A position on whether a competent 14-year-old has and should have decision rights.
- 05How you would have decided had the disease state not intervened.
- 06A health care policy analysis including support and resistance, using Malone's ten framework questions.
The model, the rights analysis, then the policy pass
The dilemma stated
Set out the Exercise 4-3 case and the physician's request precisely.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A problem statement that identifies the actual conflict.
Working the decision model
Apply each stage of the model, including reviewing the outcome.
What the assessor is likely looking for
The model driving the analysis rather than labelling it.
Moral distress and its remedies
Define distress as constrained action and propose structural responses.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Structural remedies rather than individual resilience.
Competing rights in the second case
Identify the rights in tension and argue which should take precedence.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A precedence argument, not a list of rights.
The minor's decision
Separate legal capacity from ethical assent and answer both questions asked.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Two distinct answers to two distinct questions.
The policy pass
Reframe the case as a rule question and map support and resistance.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A different unit of analysis from the ethics section.
The framework questions
Apply the ten framework questions to the proposed policy.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Questions answered rather than listed.
Where the ethics and policy frames sit
Recommended databases
- NCBI Bookshelf
- PubMed Central
- American Nurses Association
- CINAHL
Search sequence
- 1.Read both case studies in the textbook before applying anything.
- 2.Look up moral distress as a defined construct rather than using it loosely.
- 3.Check the mature minor doctrine before writing the legal half.
- 4.Search health policy analysis frameworks for the political mapping section.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Nursing Ethical Considerations
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Nursing ethical considerations, for the principles the decision model operates on.
Research Ethics
StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf · 2023
Consent and capacity, for the minor decision-making analysis.
Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system
BMC Medical Ethics · 2015
Ethical oversight and competing duties, for the rights precedence argument.
COLLABORATION WITHIN THE INTERPROFESSIONAL TEAM
Nursing Management and Professional Concepts, NCBI Bookshelf · 2022
Interprofessional collaboration, for the escalation pathways that reduce distress.
Measuring psychological safety in healthcare teams: developing an observational measure to complement survey methods
BMC Medical Research Methodology · 2020
Psychological safety, for whether a unit permits objection at all.
Before you submit
Common mistakes
- Answering the policy half in ethical terms.
- Using the decision model as section headings without applying it.
- Skipping the review step because the case ends first.
- Treating moral distress as a synonym for ethical difficulty.
- Conflating the legal and ethical positions on minor consent.
Submission checklist
- Are the ethics and policy analyses genuinely different?
- Does the model include its final review stage?
- Is moral distress defined as constrained action?
- Have you separated legal capacity from ethical assent?
- Does the policy section name supporters and opponents?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.