New here? Get 15% off your first order.See how it works

Nursing questions
Written assignmentHealth information security

HIM 615 Topic 6 Interview Summary

You are asked to interview someone at a facility where you would consider working. That framing is deliberate, and it should change the questions you prepare.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 25, 2026

01

A facility you would consider working at changes the questions

The brief does not say interview any security officer; it says identify a facility where you would consider working in health care informatics and interview someone there responsible for IT security. That is a professional contact as much as an assignment, and the questions worth preparing are ones a practitioner would find worth answering rather than ones a textbook has already answered. Asking what HIPAA requires wastes the meeting; asking how the organisation decides what counts as a reportable breach, or who has authority to stop a go-live over an unresolved security finding, produces answers that exist nowhere else and shows you have done the reading. Preparation is also what makes the meeting worth the practitioner's time, which matters if you would genuinely like to work there. Spend the preparation on the organisation rather than on the regulation, since one of those you can look up afterwards and the other you cannot.

Prepare from the exchange vocabulary the brief points you at, because that is where the interesting questions live. Health information exchange forces decisions the security officer has to make in practice: how a patient is matched across organisations and what happens when matching fails; whether patient consent is opt-in or opt-out here and how that is recorded; how access by an outside clinician is audited; and what happens to data received from a partner that turns out to be wrong. The impending regulation section the brief requires is then best asked as what is changing for you next year, since a serving officer will name something concrete and current. Write the summary around their answers rather than around your questions, and where an answer surprised you, say so and say why. Noting where you were surprised is the difference between a transcript and an assignment.

Likely learning objectives

  • Prepare questions that only a practitioner can answer.
  • Use exchange concepts to generate operational questions.
  • Ask about impending regulation in terms of what changes locally.
  • Structure a summary around the answers rather than the questions.

Assignment instructions

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Details: In this assignment, you are required to identify a health care facility where you would consider working in the field of health care informatics. Identify and interview someone who is responsible for IT security (e.g., compliance, privacy, risk, or quality). To assist in formulating salient questions, view the terms (see assigned readings related to “Health Information Exchange.”) From the discussions and insights from the discussion forum, include the questions that were pertinent to the information gathered from your interview. Focus on EHRs and software solutions. Write a 500-750-word summary of your interview. The summary should focus on EHRs, software solutions, and IT security. Include the following: Background information of the interviewee (e.g., role, title, and their professional involvement with privacy, security, patient data, and EHR hardware). HIM 615 Topic 6 Interview Summary IT security Impending government regulations APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

02

What the interview summary requires

  1. 01Identification of a health care facility where you would consider working in health care informatics.
  2. 02An interview with someone responsible for IT security, such as compliance, privacy, risk or quality.
  3. 03The questions that were pertinent to the information gathered, informed by the health information exchange readings.
  4. 04A 500-750 word summary focused on EHRs, software solutions and IT security.
  5. 05Background information on the interviewee including role, title and involvement with privacy, security, patient data and EHR hardware.
  6. 06Coverage of IT security and impending government regulations.
03

Preparation, the interview, the summary

01

The facility and why you chose it

Say what makes it somewhere you would work.

What the assessor is likely looking for

A choice with a stated reason.

02

The interviewee

Give role, title and their involvement with privacy, security and EHR systems.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Background sufficient to weigh their answers.

03

The questions

Present the questions and the readings that prompted them.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Questions only a practitioner could answer.

04

EHRs and software solutions

Report what they said about the systems in place and their limits.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Specifics about this organisation.

05

IT security in practice

Report access control, auditing, incident handling and authority.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Practice rather than policy statements.

06

Impending regulation

Report what is changing for them and how they are preparing.

What the assessor is likely looking for

Concrete and current.

04

Where the security and exchange terms sit

Recommended databases

  • HealthIT.gov
  • NCBI Bookshelf
  • NIST
  • PubMed Central

Search sequence

  1. 1.Read the exchange material the brief points at, to build the question list.
  2. 2.Review HIPAA security requirements so you can ask beyond them.
  3. 3.Check current regulatory changes in health IT before the interview.
  4. 4.Read on patient matching, which produces good operational questions.
05

Reference shortlist

These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.

Privacy, Security, and HIPAA

HealthIT.gov, Office of the National Coordinator · 2024

Review before citing

Privacy, security and HIPAA, for the baseline you should ask beyond.

Interoperability

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology · 2024

Review before citing

Interoperability policy, for the exchange decisions a security officer faces.

Cybersecurity and privacy

National Institute of Standards and Technology · 2024

Review before citing

NIST cybersecurity and privacy, for the risk framework organisations actually use.

06

Before you submit

Common mistakes

  • Asking questions whose answers are in the readings.
  • Interviewing someone whose role does not include security.
  • Summarising your questions rather than their answers.
  • Omitting the interviewee's background, which the brief requires.
  • Treating impending regulation abstractly rather than asking what changes locally.

Submission checklist

  • Is the interviewee's role clearly one with security responsibility?
  • Are the questions included as the brief asks?
  • Do the questions draw on the exchange readings?
  • Is the summary organised around their answers?
  • Are EHRs, software solutions and IT security all covered?

Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.

Written by

Maren Caldwell

MSN, RN, CNE

Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation

Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by

Dr. Tessa Redmond

DNP, RN, CNE

Evidence-based practice and clinical education

Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.

Want feedback on your plan before you draft?

Get help interpreting the brief, checking your evidence strategy, and strengthening your outline while keeping the work your own.

Get assignment guidance
Start your order