HIM 615 Topic 8 EHR Life Cycle Presentation
The brief says you should be able to present this in a job interview. That audience is more demanding than a marker and it is the standard to build against.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 25, 2026
The audience is an interview panel, not a marker
Two instructions set the standard for this deck. It is the culminating activity, so it should carry work from earlier assignments rather than starting fresh; and it is meant to be presentable in a professional job interview, which is a harder audience than a marker because an interviewer will ask what you would do when it went wrong. Build it around one authentic problem, stated in clinical terms, and let the four stages be the story of solving it. A deck organised as four sections about EHRs in general satisfies neither audience. Take that seriously and the deck acquires a spine: one problem, four stages, and a defensible claim at the end that something measurable changed. A deck organised as four sections about electronic records in general satisfies neither the rubric nor an interviewer, because neither can tell from it what you would actually do.
Measurement is the stage that decides how the deck reads, and it is the one most presentations shorten to a slide about user satisfaction. Say what the problem cost before the change, in a countable unit, and how you would know it improved: time from order to administration, duplicate imaging rate, documentation minutes per shift, the proportion of discharge summaries reaching a primary care provider within a target window. Those are the measures an interviewer would recognise. The implementation stage is where you can show judgement cheaply by naming what usually goes wrong, since go-live staffing, training that arrives too early to stick, workflow redesign left until after the build, and a downtime procedure nobody rehearsed are all documented failure patterns. Bring the interoperability and stakeholder concepts the brief lists into the stages where they belong rather than listing them separately, and use the notes for the argument so the slides stay presentable.
Likely learning objectives
- Build a deck around one authentic problem rather than a topic.
- State a baseline in countable units before proposing measurement.
- Name documented implementation failure patterns.
- Distribute the listed concepts into the stages where they apply.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Details: This is the culminating activity of the course, requiring the student to demonstrate mastery of the course’s objectives.Create a PowerPoint presentation (20–30 slides); include accompanying notes.Present the life cycle of an electronic health record (EHR).The life cycle model should include: Need Solution (used in Hardware Solution: RFP in Module 2) Implementation Measurement Integrate and apply course content by identifying an authentic problem that can be solved with an EHR. Include content and concepts from other assignments within the course. View “Health Information Exchange.” Use the content and concepts contained therein to assist in organizing your presentation. Consider the following: Interoperability Stakeholders Hardware and software requirements Planning Execution Management Measuring effectiveness Quality assurance HIM 615 Topic 8 EHR Life Cycle Presentation The deliverable is a PowerPoint presentation that you will be able to present in a professional job interview to demonstrate your proficiency in utilizing computer technologies, configurations, and applications in a health care environment. The presentation can be of an actual EHR or of a hypothetical situation. In either case, scholarly research is required. Search the GCU Library and the websites of professional health care informatics organizations, such as the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA), and the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). Useful periodicals include: Health Data Management Health Management Technology Healthcare Informatics Healthcare IT News Include graphics and relevant URL links. The PowerPoint presentation should be comprehensible, well designed, and aesthetically pleasing. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
What the culminating presentation requires
- 01A PowerPoint presentation of 20-30 slides with accompanying notes.
- 02The life cycle of an electronic health record covering need, solution, implementation and measurement.
- 03An authentic problem that can be solved with an EHR, integrating content from other course assignments.
- 04Consideration of interoperability, stakeholders, hardware and software requirements, planning, execution, management, measuring effectiveness and quality assurance.
- 05Scholarly research, whether the EHR is actual or hypothetical.
- 06Graphics and relevant URL links, in a well designed and comprehensible deck.
Need, solution, implementation, measurement
The problem
State the clinical problem and what it currently costs.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A problem with a measurable cost.
Need
Establish requirements and the stakeholders who hold them.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Stakeholders identified with their differing needs.
Solution
Describe the chosen solution and its hardware and software requirements.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A solution justified against the stated need.
Implementation
Cover planning, execution, training, workflow redesign and downtime.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Known failure patterns anticipated.
Measurement
Give baseline, target, measure and review interval.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Measures an interviewer would recognise.
Quality assurance and interoperability
Show how the solution exchanges data and how quality is sustained.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Concepts applied within the stages.
Where the professional sources sit
Recommended databases
- HealthIT.gov
- PubMed Central
- AHIMA and HIMSS
- AHRQ
Search sequence
- 1.Find implementation studies reporting what failed and why.
- 2.Look up measurement approaches used in health IT evaluation.
- 3.Read interoperability material for the exchange slides.
- 4.Search the professional bodies the brief names for current practice guidance.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review
BMC Health Services Research · 2014
Implementing EHRs in hospitals, for the documented failure patterns.
Mind the Gap: A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation
Applied Clinical Informatics · 2016
Usability and safety challenges during implementation, for the risk slides.
Interoperability
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology · 2024
Interoperability policy, for the exchange requirements of the solution.
Implementing Electronic Health Records in Primary Care Using the Theory of Change: Nigerian Case Study
JMIR Medical Informatics · 2022
Implementing records using theory of change, for a structured implementation account.
Section 4: Ways To Approach the Quality Improvement Process
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
AHRQ improvement guidance, for the measurement stage.
Before you submit the deck
Common mistakes
- Presenting EHRs in general instead of solving one problem.
- Reducing measurement to a satisfaction survey.
- Listing the required concepts on their own slides rather than applying them.
- Omitting a baseline, so improvement cannot be shown.
- Filling slides with the argument that belongs in the notes.
Submission checklist
- Is there one authentic problem stated in clinical terms?
- Is a baseline given in a countable unit?
- Does the implementation stage name specific failure patterns?
- Are the listed concepts distributed into the stages?
- Are notes present and carrying the argument?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.