Importance of nursing education and overall educational goals.
Most of this paper is personal planning. The final requirement, on continuing education and competency, is where the evidence is genuinely mixed and the paper can say something.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 25, 2026
The competency link is not a given
The personal planning sections are straightforward and their quality depends on specificity: which certification, from which body, by when, and what it requires in hours and eligibility. A timeline with dates attached is checkable and a statement of intent is not, which is why the brief asks for one. The IOM recommendations give you the framing, including the target proportion of baccalaureate-prepared nurses and the call for seamless academic progression, and the follow-up report a decade later is worth citing because it reports what actually happened to those targets rather than restating them. A timeline with dates attached is checkable and a statement of intent is not, which is exactly why the brief asks for one rather than for a description of your ambitions. Say what each credential requires in eligibility hours and clinical practice, because those requirements are what determine whether the timeline is realistic.
The last requirement is where a good paper does something more than plan. The relationship between continuing education and competency is not simple, and saying so with evidence is stronger than assuming it. Hours completed are an input rather than an outcome, and the literature on continuing professional development consistently finds that passive formats change knowledge more than practice, while interactive, repeated and practice-linked formats change practice more reliably. That is a useful distinction for a nurse choosing how to spend limited education time, and it connects directly to the competency and performance language the requirement uses. The employment section should be equally concrete about what the market actually rewards, since some roles are closed without a specific degree, others prefer it, and a few pay no differential at all, and knowing which is which is what makes the competitiveness argument real rather than aspirational.
Likely learning objectives
- Write educational goals with dates, bodies and requirements attached.
- Cite the follow-up report as well as the original recommendations.
- Distinguish education hours as an input from competency as an outcome.
- Identify which roles require, prefer or ignore a given credential.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
The IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” makes recommendations for lifelong learning and achieving higher levels of education. In 1,000-1,250 words, examine the importance of nursing education and discuss your overall educational goals. Include the following: Discuss your options in the job market based on your educational level. Review the IOM Future of Nursing Recommendations for achieving higher levels of education. Describe what professional certification and advanced degrees (MSN, DNP, etc.) you want to pursue and explain your reasons for wanting to attain the education. Discuss your timeline for accomplishing these goals. Discuss how increasing your level of education would affect how your competitiveness in the current job market and your role in the future of nursing. Discuss the relationship of continuing nursing education to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics. Discuss whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory. Provide support for your response. You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Include at least 4 sources no older than 5 years You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Course-wide instructions that accompany this question
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
What the paper requires
- 01A 1,000-1,250 word paper examining the importance of nursing education and your overall educational goals.
- 02Your options in the job market based on your educational level.
- 03A review of the IOM Future of Nursing recommendations for achieving higher levels of education.
- 04The professional certification and advanced degrees you want to pursue, and your reasons.
- 05A timeline for accomplishing these goals.
- 06How increasing your education would affect your competitiveness and your role in the future of nursing.
- 07The relationship of continuing nursing education to competency.
Market, recommendations, goals, timeline
Where you are now
State your current credential and the roles it opens.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A market description specific to the credential.
The IOM recommendations
Summarise the education recommendations and what followed them.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Both the report and its follow-up used.
What you intend to pursue
Name the certification or degree, the body and the requirements.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Specific and verifiable.
Timeline
Give dates, prerequisites and dependencies.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A plan that could be checked against.
Competitiveness
Say what the credential opens, prefers and does not change.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Honesty about differentials.
Continuing education and competency
Distinguish inputs from outcomes and formats by effect.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Evidence rather than assumption.
Where the workforce evidence sits
Recommended databases
- NCBI Bookshelf
- American Nurses Association
- PubMed Central
- HRSA
Search sequence
- 1.Read the Future of Nursing report's education recommendations.
- 2.Read the 2020-2030 follow-up for what happened to them.
- 3.Search continuing professional development effectiveness by format.
- 4.Check workforce data for what the market rewards.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
The Future of Nursing
Institute of Medicine, NCBI Bookshelf · 2011
The Future of Nursing, for the original education recommendations.
The Future of Nursing 2020-2030
National Academy of Medicine, National Academies Press (US) · 2021
The Future of Nursing 2020-2030, for what followed the original targets.
The Nursing Workforce - The Future of Nursing 2020-2030
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, NCBI Bookshelf · 2021
The nursing workforce chapter, for education levels and the labour market.
Expanding Leadership and Professional Development Opportunities for Oncology Nurse Practitioners
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · 2024
Professional development opportunities, for the competency and format question.
Health Workforce Projections
Bureau of Health Workforce, Health Resources and Services Administration · 2026
Workforce projections, for the market your credential enters.
Before you submit
Common mistakes
- Stating goals without dates or requirements.
- Citing the original report and ignoring what followed it.
- Assuming continuing education produces competency.
- Describing the job market in general rather than for your credential.
- Treating all continuing education formats as equivalent.
Submission checklist
- Does the timeline have dates and prerequisites?
- Is the follow-up report cited alongside the original?
- Is the education-to-competency link treated as evidence rather than assumption?
- Are formats distinguished by their effect on practice?
- Is the job market described for your specific credential?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.