Discussion postComplementary medicine

DQ 2 : What evidence is there about providing care for patients of all cultures.

Two parts that look related and are graded separately. Part A wants one therapy sourced from NCCIH and integrated into a care plan; part B wants linguistic barriers and the specific safety risk they create for an APRN.

Editorial process

Last reviewed · August 22, 2026

Written by

Maren Caldwell

MSN, RN, CNE

Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation

Reviewed by

Dr. Tessa Redmond

DNP, RN, CNE

Evidence-based practice and clinical education

On this page

Interpret the task
Assignment instructions
Deliverables
Proposed outline
Research plan
Reference shortlist
Final review

Two parts, and why part B is not about part A

The prompt announces two parts and students routinely write one. Part A is a therapy: choose a single complementary modality, source it from NCCIH as instructed rather than from a general search, and do three things with it. Summarise what it is, report what the evidence actually shows including where it is weak, and then integrate it into a care plan for a named patient situation. That last step is the one that separates a summary from an answer. Integration means saying what you would ask, what you would document, what you would monitor and what interaction or contraindication would make you advise against it. Herbal products are the sharpest example, because the interaction risk with anticoagulants, antihypertensives and antidepressants is real and it is exactly the sort of thing an APRN is accountable for noticing. The evidence sentence matters as much as the summary: NCCIH is unusually direct about which modalities have trial support and which do not.

Part B is not a continuation of part A, and reading it as one loses half the marks. It is about language, which is a distinct barrier from culture and is often collapsed into it. Say what the evidence-based guidance actually requires: qualified medical interpreters rather than family members or ad hoc bilingual staff, translated and readability-checked written materials, and documentation of the interpretation method used. Then name the safety concerns in APRN terms, because that is what the prompt asks for and it is concrete. Consent obtained through an untrained interpreter may not be informed. Medication instructions misunderstood produce dosing errors that present later as non-adherence. A history taken through a family member is filtered by that relative's interests, which is why intimate partner violence and mental health symptoms are systematically under-reported in those encounters. Each of those is a documented failure mode rather than a theoretical risk, which is why they belong in an answer about safety.

Likely learning objectives

Summarise one complementary therapy from an authoritative source and appraise its evidence.
Integrate a complementary therapy into a care plan with monitoring and contraindications.
Distinguish linguistic barriers from cultural ones.
State specific patient-safety consequences of inadequate interpretation.

Assignment instructions

Read the full question

Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.

Herzing NU 626 Unit 5 DQ 2 Discussion Prompt This discussion has two parts: 1A. Using the National Center for Complimentary and Integrated Health (NCCIH) at https://nccih.nih.gov/, provide research about a complementary therapy. Provide a summary overview of the therapy. What evidence is there about providing care for patients of all cultures. Discuss how you would work with a patient to integrate the therapy into his/her care plan. 1B. Using transcultural care concepts, provide evidence-based practice guidelines that illustrate how linguistic challenges interfere with culturally competent care. What are the safety concerns for APRN providers? Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position. Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.

Course-wide instructions that accompany this question

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS Discussion Questions (DQ) Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. Herzing NU 626 Unit 5 DQ 2 One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses. Weekly Participation Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. APA Format and Writing Quality Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition. Use of Direct Quotes I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. LopesWrite Policy For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Late Policy The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Communication Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Turn the brief into deliverables

01One named complementary therapy, sourced from NCCIH.
02A summary of the therapy and an honest account of its evidence base.
03A care plan integration including monitoring and a contraindication.
04Evidence-based guidance on language access.
05Named safety concerns for the APRN, not general statements about communication.