Health promotion and disease prevention Assignment 4
The title says health promotion; the content is organisational values. One sentence asks you to connect them, and that sentence is where the assignment is actually hard.
Editorial process
Last reviewed · August 25, 2026
The bridging sentence is the assignment's real question
Read the requirements and one sentence sits awkwardly among the others: how does this relate to health promotion and disease prevention in the larger picture? Everything else is about organisational values, nurse engagement and workplace communication, so that sentence is asking you to build a bridge, and the bridge has a real mechanism behind it. Engaged nurses do the discretionary work that prevention consists of, because smoking cessation counselling, immunisation prompting, teach-back on discharge instructions and screening follow-up are almost never the thing that stops a shift ending, and they are the first tasks to disappear when a nurse is disengaged or short-staffed. Prevention is discretionary effort at the bedside, so anything that depletes discretionary effort reduces prevention. That is the bridge the assignment is asking for, and it can be argued rather than merely asserted. Anything that depletes that effort therefore reduces prevention, and the connection is measurable rather than rhetorical.
The values-alignment claim needs the same treatment, since asserting that alignment improves outcomes is where the rubric expects evidence rather than sentiment. Argue the mechanism: misalignment shows up as moral distress and as intention to leave, turnover degrades continuity and increases orientation load on the remaining staff, and both of those have measured associations with patient outcomes. That chain is defensible and each link can be cited. The personal instance the brief requires should be chosen to illustrate the mechanism rather than to vent, so pick a case where you can name the value, the organisational behaviour that contradicted or supported it, and something that visibly changed for patients. On the communication requirement, name actual techniques such as SBAR, structured huddles or closed-loop communication, because the rubric asks for techniques and generic advice about listening will not read as one. Each of those has a name, a documented use and a literature behind it.
Likely learning objectives
- Build a defensible bridge from engagement to prevention activity.
- Argue values alignment through moral distress, turnover and continuity.
- Choose a personal instance that illustrates a mechanism.
- Name specific communication techniques rather than general advice.
Assignment instructions
Read the full question
Review every instruction before using the planning guidance that follows.
Prepare a 10-minute presentation (10-15 slides, not including title or reference slide) on organizational culture and values. Describe how alignment between the values of an organization and the values of the nurse impact nurse engagement and patient outcomes. Discuss how an individual can use effective communication techniques to overcome workplace challenges, encourage collaboration across groups, and promote effective problem solving. Incorporate how system needs and the culture of health may influence the outcomes. How does this relate to health promotion and disease prevention in the larger picture? Identify a specific instance from your own professional experience in which the values of the organization and the values of the individual nurses did or did not align. Describe the impact this had on nurse engagement and patient outcomes. While APA style format is not required,solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment. You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor. The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
What Assignment 4 requires
- 01A 10-minute presentation of 10-15 slides, excluding title and reference slides.
- 02A description of how alignment between organisational and nurse values affects engagement and patient outcomes.
- 03A discussion of communication techniques for overcoming workplace challenges, encouraging collaboration and promoting problem solving.
- 04Consideration of how system needs and the culture of health influence outcomes.
- 05A connection to health promotion and disease prevention in the larger picture.
- 06A specific instance from your own professional experience of alignment or misalignment, with its impact.
- 07In-text citations and references in APA documentation style.
Values, communication, and the connection to population health
What organisational values are in practice
Distinguish stated values from the behaviours the organisation rewards.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Espoused versus enacted values separated.
Alignment, engagement and turnover
Trace misalignment through moral distress to intention to leave.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A chain with evidence at each link.
From engagement to patient outcomes
Connect continuity, staffing and discretionary effort to measured outcomes.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Outcomes named rather than implied.
Communication techniques
Present SBAR, huddles and closed-loop communication with where each is used.
What the assessor is likely looking for
Techniques with a stated context of use.
The prevention bridge
Show why prevention activity depends on discretionary effort.
What the assessor is likely looking for
The bridging sentence answered explicitly.
Your instance
Describe the case and what changed for nurses and patients.
What the assessor is likely looking for
A case that demonstrates the mechanism.
Where the engagement and outcomes evidence sits
Recommended databases
- PubMed Central
- AHRQ
- American Nurses Association
- NCBI Bookshelf
Search sequence
- 1.Search nurse engagement and patient outcomes for the association evidence.
- 2.Read the moral distress literature for the misalignment mechanism.
- 3.Look up nurse staffing and outcomes for the continuity link.
- 4.Find a source on structured communication techniques for the middle section.
Reference shortlist
These are authoritative starting points, not a ready-made bibliography. A qualified reviewer must confirm that each source fits the assignment and supports the claim beside which it is cited.
Impact of Nurse Manager Leadership Styles on Work Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review
Journal of Nursing Management · 2023
Nurse manager leadership styles and work engagement, for the engagement half.
The Limbic Brain, Moral Distress and Ethical Decision-Making in Nursing Practice
PMC / National Library of Medicine · 2025
Moral distress and ethical decision-making, for what values misalignment produces in practice.
Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infection
American Journal of Infection Control, 40(6), 486-490 · 2012
Nurse staffing, burnout and infection, for the outcome end of the chain.
TeamSTEPPS 3.0
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality · 2024
TeamSTEPPS, for named structured communication techniques.
Effects of Work Engagement and Barriers on Evidence-Based Practice Implementation for Clinical Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study
Healthcare (MDPI), via PubMed Central · 2024
Work engagement and evidence-based practice implementation, for discretionary effort.
Before you submit the presentation
Common mistakes
- Skipping the health promotion connection or asserting it without a mechanism.
- Claiming values alignment improves outcomes with no chain of evidence.
- Using the personal instance to vent rather than to illustrate.
- Offering communication advice instead of named techniques.
- Filling slides with text for a ten-minute delivery.
Submission checklist
- Is the link to prevention argued through a named mechanism?
- Is the alignment claim supported by cited evidence at each link?
- Does the personal instance name a value, a behaviour and a patient effect?
- Are specific communication techniques named?
- Is the deck inside 10-15 slides and deliverable in ten minutes?
Use this guide to plan and review your own work. Follow your institution's rules and read Brinevia's academic-integrity policy.
Written by
Maren Caldwell
MSN, RN, CNE
Medical-surgical nursing, pharmacology and NCLEX preparation
Maren is a registered nurse with over 15 years of clinical and educational experience in medical-surgical nursing. She writes on NCLEX preparation, patient care fundamentals, pharmacology and evidence-based practice.

Reviewed by
Dr. Tessa Redmond
DNP, RN, CNE
Evidence-based practice and clinical education
Tessa is a doctorally-prepared nurse educator. She reviews Brinevia content for clinical accuracy and alignment with current evidence-based guidelines.